Even if the woman swerved to avoid an "accident", it was still because she was not keeping a safe distance from the vehicle in front of her, or her attention was not where it should have been.
Take this scenario; the biker is in the right lane, on a unlicensed motorcycle, and the same "sorry did not see you" driver turns in front of him, how on heaven's earth would the fitment of a license disc have avoided her recklessness? The biker on a unlicenced bike should not have been on the road, yet the law finds that a separate issue, and not detracting from the car driver's fault.
WTF dos it help you she swerved to avoid hitting the guy in front of her because she was obviously TAILGATING, and she kills a biker?

Rather ram the guy in front, but aaah yes then she would have been the guilty party.
What if there was an ambulance in the emergency lane, racing to a serious accident scene, and she writes them all off?
JVR, ek weet die biker was onwettig in die noodlaan, so in jul opinie is hy nou voelvry?
My probleem met die saak is die talle gevalle waar bikers doodgery word omdat motoriste van baan/rigting verander sonder om te kyk, en sonder om aan te wys. Geen padstelsel kan werk op so n manier nie.
En onthou Jacko, as jou vrou op enige pad moet rem sodat die rook by haar wiele uitkom, dan is dit omdat sy te na aan voorste verkeer was. Niks anders nie. Hier glo niemand mos in volgafstande nie. Stuur haar op jou gevorderde kursus.