Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Author Topic: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?  (Read 3559 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OomD

R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« on: May 03, 2016, 03:26:21 pm »
Was chatting the other day and we wondered why they use universal joints on the drive shaft and not CV joints. Probably a cost thing, but would there be any other reason?
 

Offline Beebop

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: BMW R1150GS Adventure
    Location: Gauteng
  • Posts: 3,232
  • Thanked: 64 times
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2016, 03:47:26 pm »
Universal is sealed. CV joint would need to be sealed which increases risk of contamination if the seal is damaged  ???
Someone else got ideas ?

 

Offline ratrap

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: Honda XRV 750 Africa Twin
    Location: Western Cape
  • Posts: 2,451
  • Thanked: 17 times
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2016, 03:53:44 pm »
Maybe because the drive shaft only moves in one plane a universal is sufficient.
CV has to cope with movement in two planes.
No matter how much you push the envelope, it'll still be stationery.
 

Offline Parkinoff

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: BMW R1200GS HP2
    Location: Western Cape
  • Posts: 1,769
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2016, 07:03:08 pm »
If I can get a CV small enough I'll change/modify  to CV.
My rides:

Super Hex TTI Alexithymia with completely unnecessary, but very expensive Nemophilistic suspension. Electroflux Gogglemaster Oenophilia Edition. 1983 (very rare) Yonderly Bawhair with heated grips.
 

Offline Welsh

  • BMW R1150GSV
  • Bachelor Dog
  • *****
  • Bike: BMW R1150GS
    Location: Gauteng
  • Posts: 17,207
  • Thanked: 268 times
  • Thunder Twonk. The two legged Twat Monkey.
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2016, 07:18:39 pm »
Absolutely no idea. :biggrin:
If I had a dollar for every girl that found me unattractive, they'd eventually find me attractive.
 

Offline TheBear

Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2016, 07:20:35 pm »
Was chatting the other day and we wondered why they use universal joints on the drive shaft and not CV joints. Probably a cost thing, but would there be any other reason?

I am not sure, but CV Joints are much more expensive and their advantage is they allow more movement than universal joints.  Why use them then, when a universal will manage the movement?

If I can get a CV small enough I'll change/modify  to CV.

Why?
« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 07:21:29 pm by TheBear »
.#BRADICAL!
 

Offline OomD

Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2016, 07:39:23 pm »
Was chatting the other day and we wondered why they use universal joints on the drive shaft and not CV joints. Probably a cost thing, but would there be any other reason?

I am not sure, but CV Joints are much more expensive and their advantage is they allow more movement than universal joints.  Why use them then, when a universal will manage the movement?

If I can get a CV small enough I'll change/modify  to CV.

Why?
Well, a universal joint does not have constant transfer of power, so a CV is more efficient. Only reason, we were just wondering.
 

Offline SmuGS

  • A very quiet
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: BMW R1150GS
    Location: Eastern Cape
  • Posts: 3,170
  • Thanked: 43 times
  • Only 98 669 km.
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2016, 07:46:26 pm »
The canbus flux capacitor makes the CV joint obsolete so us mere mortals of the force have to make do with the tried and trusted universal...
Nee wat vlekkelose ek kuier op my lekkerste tussen die rokers,dronkgatte,vloekers,hoere en ander sondaars  :imaposer:
1150gs,  KLE 500, XT660R.
 

Offline Parkinoff

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: BMW R1200GS HP2
    Location: Western Cape
  • Posts: 1,769
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2016, 07:54:11 pm »
Was chatting the other day and we wondered why they use universal joints on the drive shaft and not CV joints. Probably a cost thing, but would there be any other reason?

I am not sure, but CV Joints are much more expensive and their advantage is they allow more movement than universal joints.  Why use them then, when a universal will manage the movement?

If I can get a CV small enough I'll change/modify  to CV.

Why?

Smooth power transfer as OomD says. The Parelever with the 2 UJ out of phase is a relatively good solution because each UJ cancels the other out but the drive shaft still accelerates and decelerates between the input and output ends and i dont think the 2 angles are always the same so some of that acceleration and deceleration wants to go to the rear wheel. I think that's the reason for the rubber cushion between the 2 drive shaft sections? Put your bike on centre stand start with rear wheel up and put into first gear, you'll hear the backlash clearly. Must be real bad on Monolever bikes it think.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 08:00:58 pm by Parkinoff »
My rides:

Super Hex TTI Alexithymia with completely unnecessary, but very expensive Nemophilistic suspension. Electroflux Gogglemaster Oenophilia Edition. 1983 (very rare) Yonderly Bawhair with heated grips.
 

Offline Sláinte Mhaith

R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2016, 07:56:58 pm »
To link to the above.
A CV joint cost more.
A CV jount is just that: A constant velocity joint.
With a universal the output velocity is not constant depending on the angle it is at.  Now put two universal in series and both at the same but opposing angle the the final output is constant speed again. Thus your input and output shaft must be in line while the drive shaft can be at an angle. The input shaft will be at a constant speed while the drive shaft will have a slight speed fluctuation and the output shaft will have a constant speed again. That is part of the reason they use a parallel arm withe the final drive to keep the angles correct.

I think a universal can also handle more power.

Edit:  I see Parkinoff beat me to it.
 

Offline Parkinoff

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: BMW R1200GS HP2
    Location: Western Cape
  • Posts: 1,769
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #10 on: May 03, 2016, 08:05:59 pm »
I don't think power is a problem on modern CVs. Some seriously big vehicles with fwd. And CVs are not that expensive. Replacement outer CV for my son's car was less than R1000. BMW should change their shaft design to a replaceable CV. Really the only weak point on the bikes in my opinion.

Wonder how the S10 deals with the oscilation as it's only got one UJ
My rides:

Super Hex TTI Alexithymia with completely unnecessary, but very expensive Nemophilistic suspension. Electroflux Gogglemaster Oenophilia Edition. 1983 (very rare) Yonderly Bawhair with heated grips.
 

Offline lecap

Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2016, 11:08:11 am »
The change of rotational speed of the universal joint is small as long as the deflection angle stays within limits. Only the high articulation angles of for example a front wheel drive car (up to 54°) require the use of constant velocity joints.

The BMW Paralevers kinematics do not constitute a parallelogram. The articulation angles of the two universal joints are NOT equal (they change as the suspension travels).

Because of the relatively small articulation angles of the bikes rear suspension even a single universal joint in the drive shaft works. This will typically be combined with some sort of elastic rotational damper either in the shaft itself or in the rear wheel hub or both.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." (Red Adair)
 

Offline Frankrzzgp

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: KTM 950 SE
    Location: Gauteng
  • Posts: 710
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2016, 11:23:55 am »
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/gmV4qwLfOMY" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/gmV4qwLfOMY</a>

This explains it very nicely....
 

Offline Parkinoff

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: BMW R1200GS HP2
    Location: Western Cape
  • Posts: 1,769
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #13 on: May 04, 2016, 11:31:49 am »
https://youtu.be/gmV4qwLfOMY


Watch this short clip and see how much the output velocity oscilates even with a relatively small input angle. The relatively small output oscilations gets amplified hugely to the outside of the wheel when the 2 UJ's do not run exactly at the same angles and even then the drive shaft will accelerate and decelerate continiously.

And yes, the two UJ angles on the Paralever are seldom at exactly the same angles so there will always be a velocity difference at the wheel.

A CV will eliminate this. Overkill and unnecessary  maybe according to BMW but it would be nice to have a replaceable CV enstead of a UJ.

Don't know how to post the actual video
« Last Edit: May 04, 2016, 11:34:48 am by Parkinoff »
My rides:

Super Hex TTI Alexithymia with completely unnecessary, but very expensive Nemophilistic suspension. Electroflux Gogglemaster Oenophilia Edition. 1983 (very rare) Yonderly Bawhair with heated grips.
 

Offline DeepBass9

  • 2010 DL1000-'91 DR650 DAKAR
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: Suzuki DL 1000 V-Strom
    Location: North West
  • Posts: 4,439
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • www.dreamlodge.co.za
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #14 on: May 04, 2016, 11:39:53 am »
Interesting, didn't know that. So on a tractor PTO you should keep the shaft as straight as possible to avoid buggering up the UJs.

Also people with 4x4s who jack up their suspension to dizzying heights also run the risk of buggering up either the drive shaft or gearbox.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2016, 11:42:31 am by DeepBass9 »
 

Offline Parkinoff

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: BMW R1200GS HP2
    Location: Western Cape
  • Posts: 1,769
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #15 on: May 04, 2016, 11:40:53 am »
OOps Frankrzzgp posted the video. The one I linked.
My rides:

Super Hex TTI Alexithymia with completely unnecessary, but very expensive Nemophilistic suspension. Electroflux Gogglemaster Oenophilia Edition. 1983 (very rare) Yonderly Bawhair with heated grips.
 

Offline Parkinoff

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: BMW R1200GS HP2
    Location: Western Cape
  • Posts: 1,769
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #16 on: May 04, 2016, 11:45:28 am »
Interesting, didn't know that. So on a tractor PTO you should keep the shaft as straight as possible to avoid buggering up the UJs.

Don't think the UJ's will get buggered sommer but whatever is driven will pump (or whatever the thing is doing) like a bike with an offset sprocket. Don't think it's a problem on a pump or something that does not mind some speed variation / oscilation. Metinks
My rides:

Super Hex TTI Alexithymia with completely unnecessary, but very expensive Nemophilistic suspension. Electroflux Gogglemaster Oenophilia Edition. 1983 (very rare) Yonderly Bawhair with heated grips.
 

Offline DeepBass9

  • 2010 DL1000-'91 DR650 DAKAR
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Bike: Suzuki DL 1000 V-Strom
    Location: North West
  • Posts: 4,439
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • www.dreamlodge.co.za
Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2016, 11:50:41 am »
Interesting, didn't know that. So on a tractor PTO you should keep the shaft as straight as possible to avoid buggering up the UJs.

Don't think the UJ's will get buggered sommer but whatever is driven will pump (or whatever the thing is doing) like a bike with an offset sprocket. Don't think it's a problem on a pump or something that does not mind some speed variation / oscilation. Metinks

Some implements have big flywheels like a baler for instance so the universals will probably be the weakest link. I see now at the end of that vid that as long as the UJs are in phase and the input and output shafts parallel you are OK, but in practice that doesn't usually happen.

Offline Sláinte Mhaith

Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #18 on: May 04, 2016, 12:15:22 pm »
Also people with 4x4s who jack up their suspension to dizzying heights also run the risk of buggering up either the drive shaft or gearbox.

Yes. Some of the extra high lift kits come with adjustable trailing arms or offset bushes or whatever is needed to correct angles etc. depending on suspension setup.
 

Offline OomD

Re: R1200GS - drive shaft, why universal joints?
« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2016, 12:37:17 pm »
This has got me wondering about the new LC's, and GSA LC's... when riding with the suspension set any higher than "Rider only" mode, there is a constant oscilation from the rear suspension. Bavarian say this is normal, but my older (2008) GS never did this. Bothers me every time I set the suspension. I'm wondering now if it could not be related to the phasing of the propshaft?

Maybe worth it having a look?