Global warming(in the negative context) is another red herring i fear...dont listen to al gore etc etc ad nauseum.... its just another liberal concept to control the masses.
Global warming could in fact have some very good benefits if u think about it.... this planet is way over populated anyway.
Yeah yeah yeah - all conspiracies, all conspiracies......Way too much time wasted on these conspiracies, don't you think?
i believe global warming is a natural phenomenon anyway although speeded up a bit i admit. The world's population is way to high an everyone would like to work to support themselves an their families , then western food aid keeps many ppl alive in africa which otherwise would have died instead of breeding more n more ppl. in order to keep ppl employed work in facotries etc etc needs to be created and increases to pollution are an obvious by product....
global warming will have benefits and its not all doom an gloom as the media etc would have u believe... an if u took all the suv's in za their total contribution to global warming is negligible when compared to eskom or sasol ...but of course you want your electricity to play yr stereo, charge yr ipod , make yr tea etc etc .... but just wont do for you to give up yr advantages ,much easier to tax the suv owner...
even a 800cc car adds to global warming so best you give up yr car an ride a bicycle or walk....any other form of transport is hypocritical.... actually in creating a bicycle somewhere along the line there is a factor that adds to warming so best u walk , preferably barefoot ....
take the Suv owner , he/she already pays way more tax than the ordinary car owner ....how
VAT on 500k is way more than VAT on 200K
petrol, SUV's use more gas and gas in ZA is 2/3 tax anyway.
tyres/parts etc etc are more expensive....
i dont begrudge suv owners , if they can afford it why not.
big houses use more electricity /materials etc etc than small houses, shall we now tax big houses cos they not as eco friendly. etc etc etc
i believe targeting suv's is a red herring because it allows goverments to get away with bigger issues as far as global warming like factories/sasol or the fact that the deputy president of ZA chartered a flight for 4 ppl to fly her wherever she wanted to go. the impact of her one trip i believe resulted in 76 000 litres of fuel being used ....
now hypocrtical ppl like al gore , he also flies chartered would you bleieve and fires scientists who dont agree with him...he also lives in house which is far more environmentally unfriendly than bush does ...hypocrit ..
and to top it all of, so they tax the suv (who is already taxed more on the fuel levies already) who is going to spend that money and on what ...ludicrous if you believe its going to be used for good...
SUV's are a status symbol to a large extent for ppl who can afford them just like big houses, DS bikes, large cars, boats, sunglasses, etc etc etc .... i would be hard pressed to find any product that in some or other way does not contribute to global warming so where do we stop taxing ....
I dont have a SUV but will defend sharks right to own one and not be discriminated against cos he does. I n some cases a diesel SUV may use less fuel than a biggish petrol car.
The real solution to global warming is cullling half the worlds population immediately ...right all the global warming warners ....u first ..let it begin.... al gore , to the front of the line please