It really makes no sense to ask others about what you should be riding. Only you know how you ride, where you ride, do you have a pillion, how much off-road are you planning, what types of trip do you do. Personally I ride long distance , two up, with panniers, 80 to 90% tar , little bit of sand roads , nothing too technical. For this my 1150 GS is good for me.
If you are riding 70 % dirt, more technical stuff, one up, not carting too much weight, The KTM or HP 2 is far more suited to your specific requirements.
Even then, this is not a hard and fast answer as I know a number of riders on 1150 and 1200 Adventures who take their bikes places that I would not even consider.
My opinion on the GS
70% TAR, 30% SAND ROADS Mix and suitability
Greater comfort
Easier to maintain
Carry more weight if required
Greater fuel range
Tubeless Tyres - not the whole range
But
Poorer suspension
Less outright vooma
Heavy
I think it was summed up as a bike that isn't the best at anything , but does everything really well.
KTM
70 % dIRT , 30% ROAD ORIENTATION - My view -please disagree
Much lighter
Great Suspension
Big Grin Factor
But
I understand maintenance can be a bear
Some complaints about parts availability
Reduced fuel range
Chain maintenance
Please understand that there are so many variables and pros and cons involved here that it would be impossible to summarise it all - I think that these are both great bikes in their own way, the question that you need to answer is which one is for me.
lIGHT lIGHT
n't d